Log in

Previous Entry | Next Entry

Review of CrapNewsNetwork article


Well I'm happy to see that Cali is smartening up and allowing same-sex marriages. Yay!!! Just have a few comments on some of the boobs who are against this

"The California Supreme Court has engaged in the worst kind of judicial activism today, abandoning its role as an objective interpreter of the law and instead legislating from the bench," said Matt Barber, policy director for cultural issues for the group Concerned Women for America, in a written statement.

"So-called 'same-sex' marriage is counterfeit marriage. Marriage is, and has always been, between a man and a woman. We know that it's in the best interest of children to be raised with a mother and a father. To use children as guinea pigs in radical San Francisco-style social experimentation is deplorable."

Excuse me? This *IS* acting as an objective interpreter of the law!! If there were laws that were placed that were based on either sex or race, then a) people would be up in arms about it and b) they would see the decisions as sexist/racist, thus removing their objectivity. Sexual orientation is like sex and race, ignoring any medical procedures, you're born that way, its not a choice!! If sex/race/orientation was a choice, then the majority of the people in the world would be WHITE, heterosexual males.

And there's no PROVEN study that says that a child raised by heterosexual parents do better then one raised by homosexual. If anything the studies prove is that women are rated as being better at raising children then men, no matter their sexual orientation. You people just ASSUME that heterosexual parents do better.

Radical social experiment?? O.o;; That would only be true if California was the first state to allow gay marriages. Other states allow gay marriage, just different forms of recognition and technicalities. But in NO way are they the first, so its not exactly radical or a social experiment. Not to mention, there are other COUNTRIES allowing gay marriage.

Okay I watched a short debated on CNN and omg... the guy against it. IDIOT!!! He said that social science proves that children do better when they have a mother and a father raising them. WTF is he reading?? And what about single-parents? Is he saying that they're of less merit because there's only one parent around? The idiot also linked allowing gay marriage to polygamy. *sigh* He also said that a UK study found that gay marriage devalues marriage.... Dude, there are OTHER factors that "devalues" marriage and its not just the allowance of gay marriage. Like the lack of SOCIAL pressure and the lack of RELIGIOUS importance in many people's lives

Anyone else like to add to this?



Latest Month

February 2010
Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Terri McAllister